Showing posts with label organisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label organisation. Show all posts

Tuesday, 31 January 2012

Organisation for an Operations Department

I just passed the 1000 visitors threshold on this blog; motivation enough to write something I feel very strongly about - the organisational structure for any operations department. Once I have done that I can talk about KPIs. When I say operations I mean mainly production and manufacturing. 


The biggest ever "no go" is something I tend to find in most production departments - production planning is reporting to the production manager. What a blunder! 


Generally, there is not a single positive result when having this structure in place. The main reason for this is that production managers usually think in terms of fix cost degression, which means, the more material runs through a machine the cheaper the product becomes since fix costs tend to zero out with rising volume. 


The problems with this way of thinking are: 

  1. Batch sizes are bigger than the market need, which means rising stock levels, full warehouses, old stock which might get out of date, hence cannot be sold anymore. The cost implication of this is: rising working capital (stock value), rising warehouse costs, rework and obsolescence.  
  2. The factory is more likely to run under capacity constraints, as bigger batches bind capacity. This is a cost factor, as widening capacity is linked to further costs (overtime, more working hours, etc).
  3. Bound capacity can result in lack or loss of customer satisfaction, as promised time lines for delivery might not be hit. 
  4. A blown up organisation which is not reflected by real customer demand. 
So, what's the way out? In order to get away from this "batch size dictatorship" by the production department, a separate planning department must be established which does not report to the production manager but is independent. 

The planning department fixes the production plan and forces production to produce what's really needed. 

I have implemented loads and loads of organisations like these and will explain more in further blog entries. Obviously, I will talk about KPIs for both departments (planning and production), too. It is just too much for a single blog entry as I just realised, and, on a more practical note, as author of this blog, I need a few more topics to write about anyway.  ;-) 

Thursday, 7 May 2009

Mazda - Organisation

The organisational development bit turned out to be pretty difficult. What we did was to create an "Organisational Brown Paper" where we drew the current organisation in its rather detail.

We also had a list of all the salaries per department, so we could detect the cost per department (and the turn-over).

Then, we did the "green meadow approach", where we sat down and created the "new" organisation as if we were to establish a new company and we could use as many people from the "old" payroll as we wanted. We had several workshops, mainly with the directors and HR.

The final result was a suggestion for a new organisation. Initially, we did not sell the implementation of that new organisation, only a suggestion for a new one.

It sounds very easy, but the main problem was this HUGE resistance of literally everyone. I was greeted with hostility whenever I was spotted somewhere in the building. But we finally got it!

I had a task force. His name was Dominic. He was working as manager in one of their warehouses and he helped me with the organisation and the warehouses.

Tuesday, 5 May 2009

Mazda - UK!

After that year with Otto Bock, I finally got a project in the UK. My first proper job there since I started my career and moved to London. We are in the year 2002 now.

I was on a project in Tunbridge Wells, with a Mazda spinn-off. The project had 3 parts: car sales, organisational realignment and warehousing. My part was the organisation and the warehouses.

The client was a difficult one. The chairman was from Japan, there was an English CEO, and several English board members. There were constant frictions between chairman and CEO. I can talk that openly as this company does no longer exist.

The chairman was rather "tough" when it came to organisation, the CEO was more "soft" but also unreliable and sometimes with outbursts of verbal violence. A tough cookie!

The board of directors was also extremely difficult to deal with, especially my warehouse director.